000			04175nam a2200529 a 4500
999			_c972 _d972
001			peEBC326021
003			MKT
005			20190328154941.0
006			m o d |
007			cr cn|||||||||
008			071217s2007 enk sb 001 0 eng
010			_z 2007300395
015			_aGBA720442 _2bnb
016	7		_z013694308 _2Uk
020			_z9780521876339 (hbk.)
020			_z0521876338 (hbk.)
020			_a9780511342400 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a0511342403 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a9780511493775 _q(ebook)
020			_a0511493770 _q(ebook)
035			_a(MiAaPQ)EBC326021
035			_a(Au-PeEL)EBL326021
035			_a(CaPaEBR)ebr10196257
035			_a(CaONFJC)MIL108498
035			_a(OCoLC-M)182762149
040			_aMiAaPQ _cMiAaPQ _dMiAaPQ _dCSt
043			_ae-uk---
050		4	_aKD4080 _b.J83 2007
082	0	4	_a342.41085 _222
245	0	0	_aJudicial reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act _h[electronic resource] / _cedited by Helen Fenwick, Gavin Phillipson and Roger Masterman.
260			_aCambridge, UK ; _aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _cc2007.
300			_axxvii, 455 p.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505			_a1. Judicial Reasoning and the Human Rights Act 1998 Helen Fenwick, Roger Masterman and Gavin Phillipson; Part I. The Interpretation of the Human Rights Act 1998: 2. The System of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act: The View from the Outside Colin Warbrick; 3. Aspiration or Foundation? The Status of Strasbourg Jurisprudence and the 'Convention Rights' in Domestic Law Roger Masterman; 4. Institutional Roles and Meanings of 'Compatibility' under the Human Rights Act 1998 David Feldman; 5. Choosing between Sections 3 and 4 Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Reasoning after Ghaidan v Mendoza Aileen Kavanagh; 6. Clarity postponed? Horizontal Effect after Campbell and Re. S. Gavin Phillipson; 7. The Standard of Judicial Review and Legal Reasoning after the Human Rights Act Ian Leigh; 8. Principles of Deference under the Human Rights Act Sir David Keene; Part II. The Human Rights Act and Substantive Law: 9. The Common Law, Privacy and the Convention Gavin Phillipson; 10. Judicial Reasoning in Clashing Rights Cases Helen Fenwick; 11. Family Law and the Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Restraint or Revolution? Sonia Harris-Short; 12. Article 14: A Protector, Not a Prosecutor Aaron Baker; 13. Criminal Procedure, The Presumption of Innocence and Judicial Reasoning under the Human Rights Act Paul Roberts; 14. Concluding remarks Ian Leigh.
520			_aJudicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading experts in the field, which examines judicial decision-making under the UK's de facto Bill of Rights. The book focuses both on changes in areas of substantive law and the techniques of judicial reasoning adopted to implement the Act. The contributors therefore consider first general Convention and Human Rights Act concepts - statutory interpretation, horizontal effect, judicial review, deference, the reception of Strasbourg case-law - since they arise across all areas of substantive law. They then proceed to examine not only the use of such concepts in particular fields of law (privacy, family law, clashing rights, discrimination and criminal procedure), but also the modes of reasoning by which judges seek to bridge the divide between familiar common law and statutory doctrines and those in the Convention.
533			_aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.
610	1	0	_aGreat Britain. _tHuman Rights Act 1998.
650		0	_aCivil rights _zGreat Britain.
650		0	_aJudicial process _zGreat Britain.
650		0	_aLaw _zGreat Britain _xInterpretation and construction.
700	1		_aFenwick, Helen.
700	1		_aPhillipson, Gavin.
700	1		_aMasterman, Roger.
710	2		_aProQuest (Firm)
856	4	0	_uhttps://portal.knchr.org/Library/My%20eBooks/Judicial%20reasoning%20under%20UK.pdf _yClick here to download
942			_2lcc _cE-BOOK