000 | 02913cam a2200457 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c846 _d846 |
||
001 | 63171122 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20190325102438.0 | ||
008 | 060123s2007 enk b 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a2006002130 | ||
020 | _a0521864763 (hardback) | ||
020 | _a9780521864763 (hardback) | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)63171122 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _cDLC _dBAKER _dBTCTA _dC#P _dYDXCP _dYDX _dWLL _dUtOrBLW |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
043 | _an-cn--- | ||
049 | _aEEMB | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aKE4248 _b.W35 2007 |
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aKE4248 _b.W35 2007 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a347.71/012 _222 |
100 | 1 |
_aWaluchow, Wilfrid J. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n88669671. |
|
245 | 1 | 2 |
_aA common law theory of judicial review : _bthe living tree / _cW.J. Waluchow. |
260 |
_aCambridge ; _aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c2007. |
||
300 |
_ax, 283 pages ; _c24 cm. |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent. |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia. |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier. |
||
490 | 1 | _aCambridge studies in philosophy and law. | |
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [273]-278) and index. | ||
505 | 0 | _aAcknowledgements -- A charter revolution -- Constitutionalism -- Why charters? -- The critics' case -- A mixed blessing -- Common law constitutionalism. | |
520 | _aIn this study, W. J. Waluchow argues that debates between defenders and critics of constitutional bills of rights presuppose that constitutions are more or less rigid entities. Within such a conception, constitutions aspire to establish stable, fixed points of agreement and pre-commitment, which defenders consider to be possible and desirable, while critics deem impossible and undesirable. Drawing on reflections about the nature of law, constitutions, the common law, and what it is to be a democratic representative, Waluchow urges a different theory of bills of rights that is flexible and adaptable. Adopting such a theory enables one not only to answer to critics' most serious challenges, but also to appreciate the role that a bill of rights, interpreted and enforced by unelected judges, can sensibly play in a constitutional democracy. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aJudicial review _zCanada. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008122566. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aCivil rights _zCanada. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008101031. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aCommon law _zCanada. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85028993. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aJudicial review. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85070963. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aCivil rights. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026371. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aCommon law. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85028993. |
|
830 | 0 |
_aCambridge studies in philosophy and law. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n88501651. |
|
856 |
_uhttps://portal.knchr.org/Library/My%20eBooks/Common%20law%20theory%20judicial%20review.pdf _yClick here to download |
||
942 |
_2lcc _cE-BOOK |