000 02315nam a2200397Ia 4500
999 _c839
_d839
001 peEBC424622
003 MKT
005 20190325093235.0
006 m o d |
007 cr cn|||||||||
008 081110s2009 enka sb 001 0 eng d
010 _z 2008049118
020 _z9780521896931 (hbk.)
020 _z0521896932 (hbk.)
035 _a(MiAaPQ)EBC424622
035 _a(Au-PeEL)EBL424622
035 _a(CaPaEBR)ebr10289542
035 _a(CaONFJC)MIL205852
035 _a(OCoLC-M)1035667047
040 _aMiAaPQ
_cMiAaPQ
_dMiAaPQ
_dCSt
050 4 _aKD3410.I54
_bM335 2009
100 1 _aMaclean, Alasdair
_q(Alasdair Rhuairidh)
245 1 0 _aAutonomy, informed consent and medical law
_h[electronic resource] :
_ba relational challenge /
_cAlasdair Maclean.
260 _aCambridge, UK ;
_aNew York :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2009.
300 _axvii, 296 p. :
_bill.
490 1 _aCambridge law, medicine, and ethics
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 270-289) and index.
520 _aAlasdair Maclean analyses the ethical basis for consent to medical treatment, providing both an extensive reconsideration of the ethical issues and a detailed examination of English law. Importantly, the analysis is given a context by situating consent at the centre of the healthcare professional-patient relationship. This allows the development of a relational model that balances the agency of the two parties with their obligations that arise from that relationship. That relational model is then used to critique the current legal regulation of consent. To conclude, Alasdair Maclean considers the future development of the law and contrasts the model of relational consent with Neil Manson and Onora O'Neill's recent proposal for a model of genuine consent.
533 _aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.
650 0 _aInformed consent (Medical law)
_zEngland.
650 0 _aMedical law and ethics
_zEngland.
710 2 _aProQuest (Firm)
830 0 _aCambridge law, medicine, and ethics.
856 4 0 _uhttps://portal.knchr.org/Library/My%20eBooks/Autonomy%20informed%20consent%20medical%20law.pdf
_yClick here to download
942 _2lcc
_cE-BOOK