000			03126cam a22002894a 4500
999			_c761 _d761
001			14731409
003			MKT
005			20190322071539.0
008			070212s2006 ke b 000 0 eng
010			_a 2007380065
020			_a9966958169
040			_aDLC _cDLC _dDLC
042			_alcode
043			_af-ke---
050	0	0	_aKSK470 _b.S77 2006
245	0	0	_aStrengthening the fragile bastion : _bblueprint for judicial reform in Kenya : an ICJ policy & legal reform bulletin.
260			_aNairobi, Kenya : _bKenya Section of the International Commission of Jurists, _cc2006.
300			_avi, 78 p. ; _c21 cm.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references.
505			_aPART ONE: Strengthening the Fragile Bastion ............ . .... .. .... .... ......... .. ... 13 Introduction: Rationale for Judicial Reform .. ...... ...... .. ... .. ..... .... . .. 15 Comparative Diagnosis of the State of the Judiciary in Kenya ........ .... ..... ... 16 Past Efforts to Reform the Judiciary ..... .... .. ......... ...... . . .......... . 20 PART TWO: Proposals for Judicial Reform in Kenya ............ .......... .. .. ........ 27 Institutional Independence .. ................. i� . ........ ... .............. 29 Decisional and personal independence ................ ........ .......... 33 Budgetary and Administrative Autonomy ........ ....... __...... .... ............ . 40 Internal Dimensions of Independence ........... ...... ......... .......... . . 41 Enhancing Citizen Access to Justice ............. . ............ ........ ........ . . 48 An Independent and Professional Bar ...... ................. ....... .... .. 3 PART THREE:A Judicial Reform Programme for Kenya ..... ......... ...... ....,..,........53 Overview: Comparative lessons from a decade ofjudicial Reform ..... .............. ....55 The Case for Broad consensus, Sequencing and Prioritization .... ................. ..... 57 The Components of a Judicial Reform Programme in Kenya .............................. 58 Conclusion ........ ..... .... .......... ......... ......... . ........ . ..71 Judicial reform Checklist .................. ... ... ..... ......... ........ .. . 72 Appendix ...... _..... ... . ........... . ..... ..... . ....... . ......... . . .73 Considerations for the Design of Draft Rules for Removing a Judge ........... ............... 73 The Pre-removal Period ........... . ...... ...... .............. . ...... 73 The Principles Under Girding Removal ........ ........ .......... .......... .74 Principles for developing the Procedure for the Constitutional Tribunal .......... .... ....... . ................... ... 76
650		0	_aJustice, Administration of _zKenya.
710	2		_aInternational Commission of Jurists (1952- ). _bKenya Section.
856	4	1	_3Table of contents only _uhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy0712/2007380065.html
906			_a7 _bcbc _corigode _d3 _encip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2lcc _cBK