000			04402cam a2200721 a 4500
999			_c747 _d747
001			ocm47161325
003			OCoLC
005			20190321114621.0
008			010614s2002 enk b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2001037639
015			_aGBA228991 _2bnb
015			_aGBA1U8186 _2bnb
015			_a20020107544 _2can
016			_a(AMICUS)000025414121
020			_a0521781787 _q(hardback)
020			_a9780521781787 _q(hardback)
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _dC#P _dNLC _dUKM _dMUQ _dBAKER _dNLGGC _dBTCTA _dYDXCP _dOCLCG _dSTF _dOCLCQ _dGEBAY _dBLBSF _dGGYBL _dOCLCQ _dZWZ _dAU@ _dOCLCQ _dBDX _dOCLCF _dOCLCO _dBEDGE _dOCLCQ _dDEBBG _dLGG _dUX0 _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO
050	0	0	_aKZ1269 _b.K58 2002
055	0	1	_aKZ1269
082	0	0	_a341.26 _221
084			_a86.80 _2bcl
084			_aKC162.K66 2002 _2z
084			_aPR 2215 _2rvk
084			_aPR 2351 _2rvk
084			_aKC162 _b.K667 2002 _2moys
084			_acci1icc _2lacc
084			_acoll1 _2lacc
100	1		_aKnop, Karen, _d1960-
245	1	0	_aDiversity and self-determination in international law / _cKaren Knop. _he-book
260			_aCambridge, UK ; _aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c2002.
300			_axxii, 434 pages ; _c24 cm.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ; _v20
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 382-420) and index.
505	0		_aPart I. Self-determination in post-Cold War international legal literature -- 1. The question of norm-type -- 2. Interpretation and identity -- 3. Pandemonium, interpretation and participation -- Part II. Self-determination interpreted in practice: the challenge of culture -- 4. The canon of self-determination -- 5. Developing texts -- Part III. Self-determination interpreted in practice: the challenge of gender -- 6. Women and self-determination in Europe after World War I -- 7. Women and self-determination in United Nations trust territories -- 8. Indigenous women and self-determination.
520			_a"The emergence of new states and independence movements after the Cold War has intensified the long-standing disagreement among international lawyers over the right of self-determination, especially the right to secession. The author shifts the discussion from the articulation of the right to its interpretation. She argues that the practice of interpretation involves and illuminates a problem of diversity raised by the exclusion of many of the groups that self-determination most affects. Distinguishing different types of exclusion and the relationships between them reveals the deep structures, biases and stakes in the decisions and scholarship on self-determination. Knop's analysis also reveals that the leading cases have grappled with these imbedded inequalitites. Challenges by colonies, ethnic nations, indigenous peoples, women and others to the culture or gender biases of international law emerge as integral to the interpretation of self-determination historically, as do attempts by judges and other institutional interpreters to meet these challenges.
546			_aEnglish.
650		0	_aSelf-determination, National.
650		0	_aWomen (International law)
650		0	_aInternational law.
650		7	_aDroit international. _2eclas
650		7	_aAutodétermination. _2eclas
650		7	_aInterprétation des lois. _2eclas
650		7	_aInternational law. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00976984
650		7	_aSelf-determination, National. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01111610
650		7	_aWomen (International law) _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01177029
650	1	7	_aVolkenrecht. _2gtt
650	1	7	_aZelfbeschikkingsrecht. _2gtt
650	1	7	_aVrouwen. _2gtt
650	1	7	_aInheemse volken. _2gtt
650		7	_aSelbstbestimmungsrecht _2gnd _0(DE-588)4054390-0
650		7	_aVölkerrecht _2gnd _0(DE-588)4063693-8
650		7	_aDroit international. _2ram
650		7	_aFemmes _xDroits. _2ram
650		7	_aDroit des peuples à disposer d'eux-mêmes. _2ram
830		0	_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England : 1996) ; _v20.
856	4	2	_3Table of contents _uhttps://portal.knchr.org/Library/My%20eBooks/Diversity.and.Self-Determination.in.International.Law.May.2002.pdf _yClick here to download
907			_a.b246615771
942			_2lcc _cE-BOOK
956			_a20180906 _bnwt