000			03232cam a22003018a 4500
999			_c561 _d561
001			ocn952196770
003			MKT
005			20190318083533.0
006			m o d
007			cr |||||||||||
008			141001s2011 enk o i|0| 0 eng d
020			_a9781848590953
024	7		_a10.14217/9781848590953-en _2doi
035			_a(FR-PaOEC)9781848590953-en
040			_aFR-PaOEC _beng _cFR-PaOEC
050			_aK 3241 _b.S46 2011
100	1		_aSen, Purna.
245	1	0	_aUniversal Periodic Review _bLessons, Hopes and Expectations / _cPurna Sen
260			_aLondon : _bCommonwealth Secretariat, _c2011.
300			_a1 online resource (128 p.)
505	0		_aAbbreviations -- Message from the Commonwealth Secretary-General -- Preface -- Introduction -- Collaborating with the Commonwealth Secretariat -- What is the UPR? -- Taking Stock at the Mid-way Point -- The First Two Years of the UPR: An Analysis and Summary -- Hopes and Expectations for the UPR -- Mid-Term Commonwealth Commentary on the UPR -- List of Contributors to the Commonwealth Mid-Term Review of the UPR -- Methodology -- List of UPR Delegations and Statistics, 2008–2009 -- Statistics of UPR Stakeholder Reports, 2008–2009 -- UPR Calendar, First Cycle -- List of Participants in the Commonwealth Mid-Term Review of the UPR -- Commonwealth Secretariat Submission to the Intergovernmental Working Group on the Review of the Human Rights Council -- Graphs on Commonwealth Data -- UPR Follow-up: What Can the Human Rights Unit Do to Assist?.
520	3		_aThe UN Human Rights Universal Periodic Review (UPR) mechanism has been in place for over two years. 2008 and 2009 saw this mechanism succeed in promoting dialogues on human rights in countries from all continents and all regions, including 25 Commonwealth states.Since the inception of the UPR, the Commonwealth Secretariat has engaged with Commonwealth countries on UPR. It has offered training and helped share information and good practices, research and observations.Governments have held consultations, prepared national reports, responded to questions and recommendations during the review in Geneva and are now beginning to implement those recommendations. National human rights institutions and civil society organisations have engaged with the process through stakeholder reports and advocacy.This publication presents the experiences of key UPR actors, as shared at the Commonwealth Mid-Term Review of UPR held in 2010. It then provides timely analysis and evaluation of the UPR mechanism at all three stages of the process: preparation of the UPR report, the review in Geneva; and UPR follow up and implementation, including country by country analysis of recommendations received by each Commonwealth country.Universal Periodic Review: Lessons, Hopes and Expectations draws together the lessons of Commonwealth countries’ experiences in 2008 and 2009, and hopes and expectations for the future of UPR.
799	0		_aCommonwealth Secretariat iLibrary. _5CU
856	4	0	_zCommonwealth Secretariat iLibrary. UCB access. _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14217/9781848590953-en
907			_a.b233892916
942			_2lcc _cBK
956			_a20160622 _bCommonwealth 20160622_marc-combined-all.mrc