000 | 02992nam a22004814a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c1055 _d1055 |
||
001 | ocn154682266 | ||
003 | MKT | ||
005 | 20190408125059.0 | ||
007 | cr unu | ||
008 | 080423s2007 enka b 001 0 eng | ||
009 | Reclvl: f Addate: 080423 Addid: INN Moddate: 080825 Modid: XRF | ||
010 | _a 2008271497 | ||
015 |
_aGBA766237 _2bnb |
||
016 | 7 |
_a013823727 _2Uk |
|
020 | _a9780521868396 (hbk.) | ||
020 | _a0521868394 (hbk.) | ||
020 | _a0511366361 | ||
020 | _a9780511366369 | ||
035 | _aGLADN17765774 | ||
040 |
_aUKM _cUKM _dDLC _dBTCTA _dYDXCP _dBAKER _dGWL _dBWKUK _dGUL _dIXA _dWLL _dNLGGC _dOCLCG _dCUY |
||
042 | _alccopycat | ||
043 | _ae------ | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aKJE2725 _b.L45 2007 |
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a346.240486 _222 |
084 |
_a86.33 _2bcl |
||
090 |
_aKJE2725 _b.L45 2007 |
||
100 | 1 |
_aLeith, Philip, _d1954- |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aSoftware and patents in Europe / _cPhilip Leith. _helectronic resource |
260 |
_aCambridge, UK ; _aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c2007. |
||
300 |
_aviii, 203 p. : _bill. ; _c24 cm. |
||
490 | 1 | _aCambridge intellectual property and information law | |
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 2 | _aSoftware as machine -- Software as software -- policy arguments -- Software patent examination -- Holding the line: algorithms, business methods and other computing ogres -- The third way: between patent and copyright? -- Conclusion: dealing with and harmonising 'radical' technologies | |
520 | _aThe computer program exclusion from Article 52 of the European Patent Convention (EPC) proved impossible to uphold as industry moved over to digital technology, and the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Organisation (EPO) felt emboldened to circumvent the EPC in Vicom by creating the legal fiction of 'technical effect'. This 'engineer's solution' emphasised that protection should be available for a device, a situation which has led to software and business methods being protected throughout Europe when the form of application, rather than the substance, is acceptable. Since the Article 52 exclusion has effectively vanished, this text examines what makes examination of software invention difficult and what leads to such energetic opposition to protecting inventive activity in the software field. Leith advocates a more programming-centric approach, which recognises that software examination requires different strategies from that of other technical fields. | ||
530 | _aTable of contents also issued online. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aComputer software _zEuropean Union countries _vPatents. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aComputer software _xLaw and legislation _zEuropean Union countries. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aPatent laws and legislation _zEuropean Union countries. |
|
830 | 0 | _aCambridge intellectual property and information law. | |
856 |
_uhttps://portal.knchr.org/Library/My%20eBooks/Software%20and%20patents%20europe.pdf _yClick here to download |
||
907 | _a.b127902247 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cE-BOOK |