000 | 02981nam a2200445Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c1012 _d1012 |
||
001 | ocn666915186 | ||
003 | CaPaEBR | ||
005 | 20190329152752.0 | ||
006 | m o u | ||
007 | cr cn||||||||| | ||
008 | 070815s2007 enk sb 001 0 eng d | ||
020 | _z9780511376061 (ebook) | ||
020 | _z9780521674454 (pbk.) | ||
020 | _z052167445X (pbk.) | ||
020 | _z9780521857734 (hbk.) | ||
020 | _z0521857732 (hbk.) | ||
035 | _a(CaPaEBR)ebr10221558 | ||
040 |
_aCaPaEBR _cCaPaEBR |
||
050 | 1 | 4 |
_aRA410.5 _b.S97 2007eb |
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a344.041 _222 |
100 | 1 | _aSyrett, Keith. | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aLaw, legitimacy and the rationing of healthcare _h[electronic resource] : _ba contextual and comparative perspective / _cKeith Syrett. |
260 |
_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2007. |
||
300 | _axiii, 252 p. | ||
490 | 1 |
_aCambridge law, medicine and ethics ; _v6 |
|
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | _aWhy 'ration' healthcare resources? -- How rationing takes place? -- Rationing and the problem of legitimacy -- Rationing and the courts: theoretical perspectives -- Rationing in the courts: England -- Rationing in the courts: Canada -- Rationing in the courts: South Africa. | ||
520 | _aDr Keith Syrett argues for a reappraisal of the role of public law adjudication in questions of healthcare rationing. As governments worldwide turn to explicit rationing strategies to manage the mismatch between demand for and supply of health services and treatments, disappointed patients and the public have sought to contest the moral authority of bodies making rationing decisions. This has led to the growing involvement of law in this field of public policy. The author argues that, rather than bemoaning this development, those working within the health policy community should recognise the points of confluence between the principles and purposes of public law and the proposals which have been made to address rationing's 'legitimacy problem'. Drawing upon jurisprudence from England, Canada and South Africa, the book evaluates the capacity of courts to establish the conditions for a process of public deliberation from which legitimacy for healthcare rationing may be derived. | ||
533 |
_aElectronic reproduction. _bPalo Alto, Calif. : _cebrary, _d2009. _nAvailable via World Wide Web. _nAccess may be limited to ebrary affiliated libraries. |
||
650 | 0 |
_aHealth care rationing _xLaw and legislation. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aHealth care rationing _xGovernment policy. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aHealth care rationing _xMoral and ethical aspects. |
|
710 | 2 | _aebrary, Inc. | |
799 | 0 |
_aEbrary electronic monographs UCB access. _5CU |
|
830 | 0 |
_aCambridge law, medicine, and ethics ; _v6. |
|
856 |
_uhttps://portal.knchr.org/Library/My%20eBooks/Law%20legitimacy%20rationing%20healthcare.pdf _yClick here to download |
||
907 | _a.b231031506 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cE-BOOK |
||
956 |
_a20151012 _bEbrary New20151005.mrc. |