Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Judging Russia [electronic resource] : Constitutional Court in Russian Politics, 1990-2006 / Alexei Trochev.

By: Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2008.Description: 1 online resource (385 p.)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 1281383414
  • 9786611383411
  • 0511397615
  • 0511511221
  • 0511396848
  • 0511399200
  • 0511396112
  • 0511398360
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: No title; No titleDDC classification:
  • 347.47/01
LOC classification:
  • KLB2620 .T76 2008
Online resources:
Contents:
Cover; Half-title; Title; Copyright; Contents; List of Figures and Tables; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Notes on Transliteration; 1 Introduction: Three Puzzles of Postcommunist Judicial Empowerment; 2 Nonlinear Judicial Empowerment; 3 Making and Remaking Constitutional Review, Russian-Style; 4 Russian Constitutional Review in Action (1990-1993); 5 Decision Making of the 2nd Russian Constitutional Court: 1995-2006; 6 The Constitutional Court Has Ruled - What Next?; 7 The 2nd Russian Constitutional Court (1995-2007): Problematique of Implementation8 "Tinkering with Judicial Tenure" and "Wars of Courts" in Comparative Perspective9 Conclusion: Zigzagging Judicial Power; Appendix; Bibliography; Statutes and Decrees; Court Decisions; Index
Summary: This book is the first in-depth study of the actual role that the Russian Constitutional Court played in protecting fundamental rights and resolving legislative-executive struggles and federalism disputes in both Yeltsin's and Putin's Russia. Trochev argues that judicial empowerment is a non-linear process with unintended consequences and that courts that depend on their reputation flourish only if an effective and capable state is there to support them. This is because judges can rely only on the authoritativeness of their judgments, unlike politicians and bureaucrats, who have the material resources necessary to respond to judicial decisions. Drawing upon systematic analysis of all decisions of the Russian Court (published and unpublished) and previously unavailable materials on their (non-)implementation, and resting on a combination of the approaches from comparative politics, law, and public administration, this book shows how and why judges attempted to reform Russia's governance and fought to ensure compliance with their judgments.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number URL Status Date due Barcode Item holds
e-book e-book KNCHR Library SharePoint Non-Fiction KLB2620 .T76 2008 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Link to resource Available
Total holds: 0

Description based upon print version of record.

Includes bibliographical references (p. 307-335) and index.

Cover; Half-title; Title; Copyright; Contents; List of Figures and Tables; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Notes on Transliteration; 1 Introduction: Three Puzzles of Postcommunist Judicial Empowerment; 2 Nonlinear Judicial Empowerment; 3 Making and Remaking Constitutional Review, Russian-Style; 4 Russian Constitutional Review in Action (1990-1993); 5 Decision Making of the 2nd Russian Constitutional Court: 1995-2006; 6 The Constitutional Court Has Ruled - What Next?; 7 The 2nd Russian Constitutional Court (1995-2007): Problematique of Implementation8 "Tinkering with Judicial Tenure" and "Wars of Courts" in Comparative Perspective9 Conclusion: Zigzagging Judicial Power; Appendix; Bibliography; Statutes and Decrees; Court Decisions; Index

This book is the first in-depth study of the actual role that the Russian Constitutional Court played in protecting fundamental rights and resolving legislative-executive struggles and federalism disputes in both Yeltsin's and Putin's Russia. Trochev argues that judicial empowerment is a non-linear process with unintended consequences and that courts that depend on their reputation flourish only if an effective and capable state is there to support them. This is because judges can rely only on the authoritativeness of their judgments, unlike politicians and bureaucrats, who have the material resources necessary to respond to judicial decisions. Drawing upon systematic analysis of all decisions of the Russian Court (published and unpublished) and previously unavailable materials on their (non-)implementation, and resting on a combination of the approaches from comparative politics, law, and public administration, this book shows how and why judges attempted to reform Russia's governance and fought to ensure compliance with their judgments.

English

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
©2019 KNCHR Library - Open Public Access Catalogue

Powered by Koha