Software and patents in Europe / Philip Leith. electronic resource
Material type:
- 9780521868396 (hbk.)
- 0521868394 (hbk.)
- 0511366361
- 9780511366369
- 346.240486 22
- KJE2725 .L45 2007
- 86.33
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | URL | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
KNCHR Library SharePoint | Non-Fiction | KJE2725 .L45 2007 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Link to resource | Available |
Browsing KNCHR Library shelves, Shelving location: SharePoint, Collection: Non-Fiction Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
![]() |
No cover image available |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
KJC1720 .E54 2001 The enforceability of promises in European contract law | KJC6048 .C35 2005 Immigrants at the margins | KJE2690 .K36 2002eb Film copyright in the European Union / | KJE2725 .L45 2007 Software and patents in Europe / | KJE3275 .G58 2006 Social rights and market freedom in the European constitution : | KJE5142 .E65 2007 Equality law for an enlarged Europe | KJE6247 .L36 2008 Implementing EU pollution control |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Software as machine -- Software as software -- policy arguments -- Software patent examination -- Holding the line: algorithms, business methods and other computing ogres -- The third way: between patent and copyright? -- Conclusion: dealing with and harmonising 'radical' technologies
The computer program exclusion from Article 52 of the European Patent Convention (EPC) proved impossible to uphold as industry moved over to digital technology, and the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Organisation (EPO) felt emboldened to circumvent the EPC in Vicom by creating the legal fiction of 'technical effect'. This 'engineer's solution' emphasised that protection should be available for a device, a situation which has led to software and business methods being protected throughout Europe when the form of application, rather than the substance, is acceptable. Since the Article 52 exclusion has effectively vanished, this text examines what makes examination of software invention difficult and what leads to such energetic opposition to protecting inventive activity in the software field. Leith advocates a more programming-centric approach, which recognises that software examination requires different strategies from that of other technical fields.
Table of contents also issued online.
There are no comments on this title.