Law, legitimacy and the rationing of healthcare [electronic resource] : a contextual and comparative perspective / Keith Syrett.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Cambridge law, medicine, and ethics ; 6.Publication details: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007.Description: xiii, 252 pSubject(s): DDC classification:
  • 344.041 22
LOC classification:
  • RA410.5 .S97 2007eb
Online resources:
Contents:
Why 'ration' healthcare resources? -- How rationing takes place? -- Rationing and the problem of legitimacy -- Rationing and the courts: theoretical perspectives -- Rationing in the courts: England -- Rationing in the courts: Canada -- Rationing in the courts: South Africa.
Summary: Dr Keith Syrett argues for a reappraisal of the role of public law adjudication in questions of healthcare rationing. As governments worldwide turn to explicit rationing strategies to manage the mismatch between demand for and supply of health services and treatments, disappointed patients and the public have sought to contest the moral authority of bodies making rationing decisions. This has led to the growing involvement of law in this field of public policy. The author argues that, rather than bemoaning this development, those working within the health policy community should recognise the points of confluence between the principles and purposes of public law and the proposals which have been made to address rationing's 'legitimacy problem'. Drawing upon jurisprudence from England, Canada and South Africa, the book evaluates the capacity of courts to establish the conditions for a process of public deliberation from which legitimacy for healthcare rationing may be derived.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number URL Status Date due Barcode Item holds
e-book e-book KNCHR Library SharePoint Non-Fiction RA410.5 .S97 2007eb (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Link to resource Available
Total holds: 0

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Why 'ration' healthcare resources? --
How rationing takes place? --
Rationing and the problem of legitimacy --
Rationing and the courts: theoretical perspectives --
Rationing in the courts: England --
Rationing in the courts: Canada --
Rationing in the courts: South Africa.

Dr Keith Syrett argues for a reappraisal of the role of public law adjudication in questions of healthcare rationing. As governments worldwide turn to explicit rationing strategies to manage the mismatch between demand for and supply of health services and treatments, disappointed patients and the public have sought to contest the moral authority of bodies making rationing decisions. This has led to the growing involvement of law in this field of public policy. The author argues that, rather than bemoaning this development, those working within the health policy community should recognise the points of confluence between the principles and purposes of public law and the proposals which have been made to address rationing's 'legitimacy problem'. Drawing upon jurisprudence from England, Canada and South Africa, the book evaluates the capacity of courts to establish the conditions for a process of public deliberation from which legitimacy for healthcare rationing may be derived.

Electronic reproduction. Palo Alto, Calif. : ebrary, 2009. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ebrary affiliated libraries.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
©2019 KNCHR Library - Open Public Access Catalogue

Powered by Koha